Legal Opinion

Hill v. Nisbet

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1885No. 9616PublishedCited by 18 opinions

From the Vanderburgh Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This suit was brought by Robert A. Hill and George W. Shanklin, against Watkins F. Nisbet, Henry F. Blount, Frederick W. Cook, William Heilman, John E. Martin, Samuel Orr, Charles E. Bennett, Daniel J. Mackey, Robert K. Dunkerson, Francis Hopkins, The Evansville Local Trade Railroad Company, The Cincinnati, Rockport and Southwestern Railway Company, and The Evansville and Terre Haute Railroad Company.

It is charged in the complaint with much particularity and ■detail of circumstance, that the appellants Hill and Shanklin are stockholders in the Evansville Local Trade Railroad Company, and that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pearce v. Madison & Indianapolis RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  2. City of Bridgeport v. Housatonuc RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1843
  3. Heaston v. Cincinnati & Fort Wayne RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Central Railroad v. CollinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1869
  5. Kitchen v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1878

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Jane Perlman v. C. Russell Feldmann, Newport Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Otis v. GregoryIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Holmes & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. Holmes & Wessell Metal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Hartung v. Architects Hartung/Odle/Burke, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Louisville Trust Co. v. Louisville, N. A. & C. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API