Pontiac Packing Co. v. Hancock
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
Facts essential to decision are as follows : Plaintiff is a domestic corporation engaged in business indicated by its name. The bill was filed by' it and in its name on April 2, 1930, to cancel and to have surrender of certificates of capital stock issued as a stock dividend to common stockholders, and for accounting of cash dividends paid thereon. Defendants are the directors and the common stockholders who received the stock dividend. Plaintiff had decree. Both plaintiff and defendants have appealed.
On April 1, 1920, the stockholders voted unanimously to increase the capital stock from…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Hayward v. LessonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
- Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. BechtelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
- Gold v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP (In re NM Holdings Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008
- Backus v. KirschMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- In Re Nm Holdings Company, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2008