Barrett v. Whitmore
Wyoming Supreme Court
Error to the District Court, Sweetwater County; Vol-ney J. Tidball, Judge. Heard on motion to consider the record in Case No. 1027 as the record in this case and also heard on motion to dismiss. Case No. 1027 involving interest of the same parties was dismissed and this proceeding was started. The motion is that the record in 1027 be considered the record in this case, which presents a different arrangement of some of the parties.
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court, Sweetwater County; Vol-ney J. Tidball, Judge. Heard on motion to consider the record in Case No. 1027 as the record in this case and also heard on motion to dismiss. Case No. 1027 involving interest of the same parties was dismissed and this proceeding was started. The motion is that the record in 1027 be considered the record in this case, which presents a different arrangement of some of the parties. Upon this ground Joseph Barrett moves to dismiss. The gist of this motion is that Mary Barrett has no right to separate herself from Patrick C. and Joseph E.…
1Opinion of the Court
Blume, Justice.
On June 8th, 1921, there was pending in this court a proceeding in error, No. 1027, fully perfected, entitled Mary Barrett, Patrick C. Barrett, and Joseph E. Barrett, plaintiffs in error, v. Tom Whitmore, as administrator of the estate of Mary Barrett, deceased, James Barrett, Union Pacific Coal Company, a corporation, E. E. Peters, and G. C. Gray, defendants in error. The only difference in the titles of this case, No. 1053, and of No. 1027 is that in the latter Patrick C. Barrett and Joseph E. Barrett are co-plaintiffs in error, whereas in No. 1053 they are, instead, made…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strong v. Carver Cotton Gin Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Pilkington v. PotwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Wilson v. MillikenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
- Hill v. FinniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Gould v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Security-First Nat. Bank v. KingWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. GulagerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Smith v. GibsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Wolfe Investments, Inc. v. ShroyerOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Megown v. FullerWyoming Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.