Hill v. Finnigan
California Supreme Court
Motion to dismiss appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Department No. 1, Ross, J.:
In this cause, judgment was entered in the Court below against the defendant on the 12th day of August, 1879; and he having made a motion for a new trial, an order was entered on the 5th of December denying the motion. On the 23rd of December, the defendant served and filed a notice of appeal to this Court from the judgment and order, and on the same day filed an undertaking on appeal. On the 29th of December, the plaintiff filed a notice of exception to the sufficiency of the sureties on the undertaking, a ’d the sureties failed to justify. On the 3rd day of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schacht v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by16 opinions
- Keaton v. Mun. Court of L.A.California Supreme Court · 1930
- De Jarnatt v. MarquezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Tompkins v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Brown v. PlummerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Hoyt v. San Francisco & North Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.