Legal Opinion

Allison-Russell-Withington Co. v. Sommers

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 21, 1929No. 6 Div. 305PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

This cis an action on the case for damages resulting from the issuance of garnishment on a judgment under Code, §§ 8052, 8053, and service of the writ on the employer of the judgment debtor, plaintiff in this case.

Count 1 of the complaint charges merely that the garnishment was “wrongfully” sued out, etc.

A rather interesting judicial history attends such actions in this state.

In the early case of Kirksey v. Jones, 7 Ala. 622 citing and following the still earlier case of Wilson v. Outlaw, Minor 367, it was declared that our statute requiring the execution of an attachment bond conditioned to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pollock & Co. v. GanttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Kirksey v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1845
  3. City National Bank v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  4. Brown v. MasterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  5. Cahaba Coal Co. v. ElliottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Hammons v. HammonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Hays v. McCartySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Turner v. BlantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. HinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API