Legal Opinion

State v. Diesing

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1989No. 88-230PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.

Edward M. Diesing appeals the Douglas County District Court’s affirmance of his conviction of what is commonly called “driving while intoxicated,” a violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 39-669.07 (Supp. 1987).

After his Douglas County Court trial, the defendant was placed on probation for 6 months, he was required to attend alcohol education classes, his driver’s license was impounded for 60 days, and as a condition of probation, he was required to pay a $100 fine and costs of prosecution. We affirm.

Diesing assigns four errors: (1) that the evidence is insufficient to show he was operating his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. FosterNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. KatzmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. MasurNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. LadehoffNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. ZellnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AndersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. HankinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. KubikNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. MarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. State v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API