Legal Opinion

State v. Ladehoff

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1988No. 87-294PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mullen, D.J.

As the result of a bench trial in the district court for Butler County, defendant-appellant, Robert W. Ladehoff, was convicted of count I of the information, theft by deception, in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-512 (Reissue 1985). The district court found Ladehoff not guilty of count II of the two-count information due to a lack of sufficient evidence. The district court sentenced Ladehoff to probation for a period of 5 years, which included, among other conditions, payment of restitution in the amount of $17,012.84 and a jail sentence of 90 days to be served at the conclusion…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ThomteNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. MonizNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. EichelbergerNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. FletcherNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. RobbNebraska Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. NullNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. IlligNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. FosterNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. DiesingNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API