Legal Opinion

State v. Katzman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1988No. 87-573PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

The defendant, William M. Katzman, was found guilty by a jury in the district court of five counts of false swearing to an initiative or referendum petition contrary to the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 32-713 (Reissue 1984). He assigns as error that (1) the statutory scheme under which he was convicted is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad; (2) his equal protection rights had been denied because of “arbitrary selection” of him by the prosecutor in filing charges; (3) his motion for a continuance was denied; (4) certain evidence was incorrectly admitted; (5) the evidence was…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. Pablo BerriosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  3. State v. CraigNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. EllisNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. LenzNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. AndersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. FellmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. FosterNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State Ex Rel. Counsel for Discipline v. JamesNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. WraggeNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API