Legal Opinion

Gomez v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 29, 2006No. 3:04-cv-02177PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING AND ORDER

CHATIGNY, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action against her former employer alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (CFEPA), Conn. Gen.Stat. § 46a-60. She also alleges a common law claim of negligent misrepresentation. Defendant has moved for summary judgment on all the claims. The CFEPA claim survives the motion for summary judgment but the other claims do not. Accordingly, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I. Facts

Viewing the summary judgment record in…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Joseph v. Treglia v. Town of ManliusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Martinez v. CONNECTICUT, STATE LIBRARYDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
  2. Missick v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  3. DeAngelo v. Yellowbook Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
  4. Mendillo v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016
  5. Boutillier v. Hartford Public SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2016

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API