Legal Opinion

Light v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 5, 2000No. 0761-99PublishedCited by 252 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case the State asks us to review whether the Third Court of Appeals properly addressed an argument it raised in its appellate brief. See Light v. State, 993 S.W.2d 740 (Tex.App. — Austin 1999). We vacate and remand.

The courts of appeals are required to review every argument raised by a party that is necessary to the disposition of that appeal. See Tex.R.App. Proc. 47.1(a);1 Davis v. State, 817 S.W.2d 345, 346 (Tex.Cr.App.1991) (holding that the courts of appeals should not dismiss a point of error when it is properly briefed by a party). Failure by a court of appeals to address a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Breazeale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Goffney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. McCloud v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Ex Parte GeorgeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by252 opinions

  1. Manley Dewayne Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  2. Burke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Murphy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  4. Egger v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  5. Kombudo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005

247 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API