Legal Opinion

Egger v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided August 29, 2001No. 04-96-00654-CRPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

ALMA L. LÓPEZ, Justice.

On original submission, we reversed and remanded the judgment of the trial court based on the application of the Helms rule and its corollary. Egger v. State, No. 04-96-00654-CR, 1997 WL 184434, at *2 (Tex.App.—San Antonio 1997), vacated, No. 868-97, slip op. (Tex.Crim.App. June 28, 2000). The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals vacated our judgment and remanded the case for reconsideration in light of Young v. State, 8 S.W.3d 656 (Tex.Crim.App.2000). Upon review of Young, we find that the Helms rule is inapplicable. We overrule appellant’s issue and affirm…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  2. Breazeale v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  3. Helms v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Light v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  5. Jack v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. James Sample v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
  2. Ortegon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
  3. Arturo Medina Moreno v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  4. Avery B. Crawford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2019
  5. Baldemoro Ortegon v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API