Legal Opinion
AST Sports Science, Inc. v. CLF Distribution Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 28, 2008No. 06-4157PublishedCited by 247 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, AST Sports Science, Inc. (AST) sued defendants, CLF Distribution Limited (CLF) and Robin Holiday, claiming they failed to pay for products received from AST. AST alleged breach of contract, breach of implied contract, unjust enrichment, and fraud in the inducement. Defendants moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. The district court granted the motion, and AST appeals. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
AST and CLF are in the business of selling health, nutrition, and vitamin products. AST is a Colorado corporation with its principal…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by247 opinions
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Bartile Roofs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Colony Insurance Co. v. BurkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Old Republic Insurance Co. v. Continental Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- EUGENE S. v. Horizon Blue Cross Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Dental Dynamics v. Jolly Dental GroupCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
242 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.