Legal Opinion
Rossberg v. Holesapple
Utah Supreme Court
Decided July 27, 1953No. 7802Published
1Opinion of the Court
123 Utah 544 (1953)
260 P.2d 563
ROSSBERG et al.
v.
HOLESAPPLE et al.
No. 7802.
Supreme Court of Utah.
Decided July 27, 1953.
John Farr Larson, Salt Lake City, for appellants.
Woodrow D. White, Salt Lake City, for respondents.
WOLFE, Chief Justice.
Action by the appellants to foreclose certain security given by the respondents for the payment of a $1600 promissory note executed by them. The respondents denied liability on the ground that the note was usurious. From a judgment declaring the note and the security null, void and usurious and cancelling the same, this appeal is prosecuted.
The evidence is…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Atlas Realty Corp. v. HouseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Chakales v. DjiovanidesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
- Oil City Motor Co. v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Cobb v. HartensteinUtah Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.