Legal Opinion

(SS) Madrigal v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided August 16, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00415Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERNEDINA MADRIGAL, No. 1:24-cv-00415-KES-SKO 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO 13 v. DISMISS BE GRANTED 14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, (Doc. 11) Commissioner of Social Security, 15 OBJECTIONS DUE: 14 DAYS Defendant. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 Plaintiff Ernedina Madrigal, proceeding pro se, initiated this action against Martin 20 O’Malley, the Commissioner of Social Security, (the “Defendant” or the “Commissioner”) by 21 filing a complaint on April 8, 2024. (Doc. 1). Defendant…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API