Goodman v. PPG Industries, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtLally-Green, J.
¶ 1 Appellants, Gary and Marie Goodman, appeal from the order dated January 27, 2003, dismissing their class action complaint against PPG Industries, Inc. (“PPG”). We affirm.
¶ 2 The factual and procedural history of the case is as follows. PPG sold a wood preservative called TBTO PILT (“PILT”) to Marvin Lumber and Cedar Company (“Marvin”). Marvin makes custom-built wood-framed doors and windows for residential customers. Appellants represent a class of residential customers who purchased PILT-treated products from Marvin between 1985 and 1989. Appellants alleged that their homes incurred…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Salvador v. Atlantic Steel Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- REM Coal Co., Inc. v. Clark Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- AM/PM Franchise Ass'n v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Turney Media Fuel, Inc. v. Toll Bros., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Samuel-Bassett v. Kia Motors America, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Reeves v. Middletown Athletic Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Barton v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- McLaughlin v. Bayer Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Slemmer v. McGlaughlin Spray Foam Insulation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.