Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. The Daneker Clock Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 12, 1975No. 74-2097PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
In this petition for review of a bargaining order, the primary issue is whether substantial evidence supports the National Labor Relations Board’s de cisión that The Daneker Clock Company violated Section 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act by refusing, as a successor employer, to bargain with a union certified to its predecessor for production and maintenance employees. **
The obligation to bargain with a certified union devolves on a successor owner as long as “the essential nature of the enterprise” remains substantially unchanged by the transfer. Tom-A-Hawk Transit, Inc. v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Tom-A-Hawk Transit, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- National Labor Relations Board v. Zayre Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- National Labor Relations Board v. Polytech, Incorporated, and Terence McGowan D/B/A Polytech, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- National Labor Relations Board v. Band-Age, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- International Association of MacHinists and Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Boeing Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Pacific Hide & Fur Depot, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- San Clemente Ranch, Ltd. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.