Legal Opinion
Tom-A-Hawk Transit, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 19, 1969No. 17450PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Circuit Judge.
This is a petition for review filed by Tom-A-Hawk Transit, Inc. challenging the Board’s finding that the company violated sections 8(a)(5) and 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act. The question for decision is whether Tom-A-Hawk is a successor of Aurora City Lines and thereby obligated to bargain with Division 215 of the Amalgamated Transit Union.
For more than thirty years Aurora City Lines, acting under the authorization of the Illinois Commerce Commission, provided municipal bus service for the city of Aurora, Illinois. During that time Division 215 of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- National Labor Relations Board v. ColtenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. ArmatoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- National Labor Relations Board v. F. G. McFarland and S. R. Hullinger D/B/A McFarland & HullingerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
3Cited by37 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Zim's Foodliner, Inc., D/B/A Zim's Iga Foodliner, and S&o, Inc., D/B/A Paul's Iga Foodliner v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Band-Age, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Interstate 65 Corporation D/B/A Continental InnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.