Phillips v. Lenox Hill Hospital
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Local 1199, Drug, Hospital and Health Care Employees Union, RWDSU, AFL-CIO (“Local 1199”), has moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 to dismiss plaintiff Russell Phillips’ (“Phillips”) complaint. Defendant Lenox Hill Hospital (“Lenox Hill”) has moved pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) to dismiss various of Phillips’ complaints against it. Phillips has opposed both applications and submitted affidavits, thus converting Lenox Hill’s application into a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c), and all parties have been afforded reasonable…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Finnegan v. LeuSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lettis v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Krakowski v. American Airlines, Inc. (In re AMR Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Hogan v. 50 Sutton Place South Owners, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1996