Legal Opinion

People v. Hillier

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 2010No. 108846PublishedCited by 181 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Kilbride, Garman, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

Defendant, Howard J. Hillier, appeals from an appellate court decision holding that the trial court violated neither Illinois law nor defendant’s fifth amendment rights when it ordered defendant to undergo a sex offender evaluation and then considered the results of that evaluation at sentencing. We hold that defendant has forfeited his arguments in a manner that precludes our review, and we thus affirm the appellate court’s decision.

BACKGROUND

Following a bench…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. PiatkowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. BryantIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by181 opinions

  1. People v. LeachIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
  2. People v. RamseyIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. RiveraIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  4. People v. ReeseIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
  5. People v. BowensAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011

176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API