People v. Hillier
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas
Chief Justice Fitzgerald and Justices Freeman, Kilbride, Garman, Karmeier, and Burke concurred in the judgment and opinion.
OPINION
Defendant, Howard J. Hillier, appeals from an appellate court decision holding that the trial court violated neither Illinois law nor defendant’s fifth amendment rights when it ordered defendant to undergo a sex offender evaluation and then considered the results of that evaluation at sentencing. We hold that defendant has forfeited his arguments in a manner that precludes our review, and we thus affirm the appellate court’s decision.
BACKGROUND
Following a bench…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- People v. HerronIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- People v. PiatkowskiIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. BryantIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by181 opinions
- People v. LeachIllinois Supreme Court · 2012
- People v. RamseyIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. RiveraIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. ReeseIllinois Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. BowensAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.