Legal Opinion

Longsworth v. Curson

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1922No. Civ. No. 4142PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

This is an appeal from a judgment of nonsuit in an action for damages alleged to have resulted from the publication of a communication charged to be libelous. The communication consisted of a letter, dated May 8, 1919, from the defendants, the employees of the report department of the tax collector's office of the county of Los Angeles, to W. O. Welch, the tax collector, and is in the following terms:

"Dear Mr. Welch: —
"Appreciating the fact that you are as interested in preventing the introduction of any discordant element into the report department, or any other subdivision of the tax…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berot v. PorteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  2. Gatewood v. GarrettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  3. Hayden v. HasbrouckSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1912
  4. Bayliss v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lundquist v. ReusserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Stevens v. SnowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Freeman v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Morcom v. San Francisco Shopping NewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Donnell v. LinforthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API