Legal Opinion
Dornell v. City of San Mateo
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 7, 2013No. CV 12-06065 CRBPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Plaintiff Debra Dornell (“Dornell”) sued her former employer Defendant City of San Mateo (“City”) for gender discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000 et seq. (“Title VII”), and California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940 et seq. (“FEHA”), as well as constructive termination in violation of public policy. The City moves to dismiss Dornell’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). See MTD (dkt.37). As explained below, the Court GRANTS the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- White v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Adetuyi v. City of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Abikar v. Bristol Bay Native Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Aquino v. Leprino Foods CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Brinker v. Axos BankDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Collins v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2024
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.