Legal Opinion
DeLoach v. Alfred
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1998No. CV-97-0484-PRPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FELDMAN, Justice.
¶ 1 We granted review to determine which state’s statute of limitations applies to an Arizona case arising out of a Tennessee automobile accident. The plaintiff is a California resident; one defendant is an Arizona resident, and the other a Tennessee resident. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. VI, § 5(3).
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶ 2 The facts are undisputed. Kevin Hamblin (“Plaintiff’), a California resident, was injured in a June 19, 1994, automobile accident in Tennessee. He was a passenger in a car operated by Kevin DeLoach that collided with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- McIntyre v. BalentineTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Bryant v. SilvermanArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Banks v. International Rental & Leasing Corp.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2011
- In re Vortex Fishing Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Liberty Tool, & Manufacturing v. Vortex Fishing Systems, Inc. (In re Vortex Fishing Systems, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Smith Ex Rel. Boston v. Arthur Andersen LLPDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.