Krahn v. J. L. Owens Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
After the former appeal, reported in 136 Minn. 53, 161 N. W. 257, defendant obtained an order requiring plaintiff to show cause why defendant's motion to vacate an order striking out defendant’s answer should not be granted. The motion was heard by Dickinson, J. From an order denying its motion, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
More than five years after the cause of action arose, three years after the case was tried, nearly three years after a motion for a new trial had been made and denied, more than two years after the order was affirmed on appeal, nearly two years after judgment was satisfied by payment, partly in cash and partly by a note and mortgage, and in this action brought to foreclose that mortgage, the defendant interposed an answer, asking that it be permitted to litigate anew the issues closed these years ago and asking that the court enjoin the enforcement of the note and mortgage and adjudge the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Krahn v. J. L. Owens Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cut Price Super Markets v. Kingpin Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Valencia v. Markham Co-Operative Assn.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Vietor v. CostelloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Smith v. Independent Silo Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926