Legal Opinion

In Re Hobbs

United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida

Decided December 8, 1997No. Bankruptcy 97-05065-6J7PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON CREDITOR’S MOTION TO LIFT THE AUTOMATIC STAY

KAREN S. JENNEMANN, Bankruptcy Judge.

This case came on for hearing on November 3,1997, on the Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay (Doc. No. 16) (“Motion”) filed by the Housing Authority of the City of Orlando (“Creditor”) and Opposition to the Motion (Doc. No. 20) filed by the debtor, Carol Hobbs (“Debtor”). Both parties also submitted memorandums of law in support of their positions (Doe. Nos. 25 & 26). Creditor argues that the automatic stay should be lifted so they may evict the Debtor from the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Sudler v. Chester Housing Authority (In Re Sudler)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Reed v. Philadelphia Housing Authority (In Re Reed)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Gibbs v. Housing Authority of City of New HavenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re ValentinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Smith v. St. Louis Housing Authority (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. Stoltz v. Brattleboro Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2001
  4. In re 2408 W. Kennedy, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2014
  5. Stoltz v. Brattleboro Housing Authority (In Re Stoltz)District Court, D. Vermont · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API