Legal Opinion

Stoltz v. Brattleboro Housing Authority

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided February 14, 2001No. 1:00-cv-00450PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum of Decision

MURTHA, Chief Judge.

Debtor Laura Ann Stoltz appeals from an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Vermont (Brown, J.) which lifted the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay thereby permitting her landlord, Brattleboro Housing Authority (BHA), to evict her from her publicly subsidized apartment. Stoltz challenges the bankruptcy court’s order on grounds that the bankruptcy judge erroneously construed the effect of the Code’s anti-discrimination section, 11 U.S.C. § 525, to the facts of her case. For reasons set forth below, the bankruptcy court’s order…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. In Re Ionosphere Clubs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. In Re: Nextwave Personal Communications, Inc. Debtor. Federal Communications Commission v. Nextwave Personal Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re ScharpUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2011
  2. Berkelhammer v. Novella (In Re Berkelhammer)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Crampton v. Immediato (In re Persinger)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
  4. Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Stokes (In re Stokes)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API