Legal Opinion

Burke v. Malaby and Gossnel

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 1904PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from the District Court of Garfield Countyj lefore James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tbe court by

Burford, C. J.:

The plaintiff in error, Joseph Y. Burke, brought suit in the district court of Garfield county against the defendants in error, W. B. Malaiby and Thomas Gossnell, for the purpose of procuring a decree quieting the title to land in Woods county, Oklahoma. The petition alleged that he was the owner and in the actual and undisputed possession of the land in question, and that' the defendants were claiming to be the owners and holders of a mortgage which constituted an apparent lien on said land, and which mortgage he alleged for reasons stated was void and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grenada County Supervisors v. BrogdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. People Ex Rel. Burrows v. Supervisors of Orange CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Newland v. MarshIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Kenney v. GreerIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Hearne v. De YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gillett v. RomigSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  2. Oklahoma Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Nicoll Et Ux. v. Midland Savings Loan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Superior Court of Creek CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Weller v. Western State Bank of WaukomisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API