Legal Opinion

Weller v. Western State Bank of Waukomis

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 14, 1907PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from the •District Court of Garfield County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OF FACTS. This was an action begiin by the plaintiff in error in the district court of Garfield county, by petition in which it was set forth that the plaintiff was a trader, residing at Roosevelt, Kiowa county, Oklahoma. That the defendant was an Oklahoma banking corporation, situated at Waukomis, Garfield county, Oklahoma.

Read the full summary

Error from the •District Court of Garfield County; before James K. Beauchamp, Trial Judge. STATEMENT OF FACTS. This was an action begiin by the plaintiff in error in the district court of Garfield county, by petition in which it was set forth that the plaintiff was a trader, residing at Roosevelt, Kiowa county, Oklahoma. That the defendant was an Oklahoma banking corporation, situated at Waukomis, Garfield county, Oklahoma. That on February 24th, 1903, there was deposited with defendant to plaintiff’s credit, $152.98, which was subject to the check of plaintiff. That on that day plaintiff…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Irwin, J.:

From an examination of the record, it is apparent that the facts of the case are about as follows: On February 24th, 1903, one Smith, paid to the defendant bank $280.00 to be placed to the credit of plaintiff, who was a merchant residing -at Eoosevelt, in Kiowa county, Oklahoma. That prior to the making of such deposit an arrangement and agreement had been entered into between the plaintiff Weller, Smith and the defendant bank, that Weller was to deposit certain securities which he held, with the bank, to be surrendered to Smith, on the payment of $280.00, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Pollard v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Jennings v. RooneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Patterson v. Marine N. BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  4. Pierce v. CarletonIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Schaffner v. EhrmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Butts v. AndersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Spruce v. Chicago, R. I. & P. RY. CO.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Missouri, K. & T. R. Co. v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Seidenbach's v. A. E. Little Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API