Legal Opinion

Rosano v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided November 6, 1985No. 200-85CPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

PHILIP R. MILLER, Judge:

This is a suit brought by a terminated probationary civilian employee of the United States Navy for back pay, reinstatement, refund of part of his health insurance premiums paid during his employment, and an incentive award. The government has moved for summary judgment, arguing the court lacks jurisdiction to award judgment on such claims, and that, in any event, the back pay and reinstatement claims are barred as res judicata by prior decisions adverse to plaintiff.

I

In November 1979, the Department of the Navy, Marine…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Hampel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  2. Contreras v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  3. Lawrence R. Rosano v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  4. Ogden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Walker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API