Legal Opinion

Millar v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 15, 2002No. C 01-0818 WDBPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS HIS FEDERAL CLAIMS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND.

BRAZIL, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On September 27, 2002, plaintiff filed a brief styled, “Memorandum of Points And Authorities In Support Of Plaintiffs Motion To Dismiss Federal Claims And Remand The Case To State Court, Or, In The Alternative, In Support Of Plaintiffs Motions To Permit Filing Of An Amended Complaint And To Vacate The Deadlines For Completing Expert Discovery, Hearing Dispositive Motions And To Continue The Trial Date.” In this motion,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. George Acri v. Varian Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  4. Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. International Primate Protection League v. Administrators of Tulane Educational FundSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. O'Keefe v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Horne v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
  3. Perez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
  4. Mohebbi v. KhazenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Maldonado v. PUERTO RICO INDUST. MFG. OPERATION CORP.(PRIMO)District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API