Legal Opinion

Cagle v. Carlson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 29, 1985No. 1 CA-CIV 6781Published

1Opinion of the Court

146 Ariz. 292 (1985)

705 P.2d 1343

Ray E. CAGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Mary E. Cagle CARLSON, dealing with her sole and separate property; Paul W. Mercer and Florence L. Mercer, individually and as husband and wife; Gertrude Doyel, widow, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 1 CA-CIV 6781.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.

January 29, 1985.

Reconsideration Denied March 21, 1985.

Review Denied September 4, 1985.

Molloy, Jones, Donahue, Trachta, Childers & Mallamo, P.C. by Herbert Mallamo, Phoenix, for plaintiff-appellant.

John P. Moore, Phoenix, for defendant-appellee, Cagle/Carlson.

Stephen…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API