Legal Opinion
Baloc v. Foley Bros.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 24, 1946No. Civil Actions Nos. 917, 955, 964PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
These three actions were commenced by plaintiffs to recover overtime compensation, liquidated damages and counsel’s fees, pursuant to section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1069, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b), hereinafter referred to as the Act. The cases were consolidated for trial. For convenience, the three actions will be referred to as the Baloc case, the Hennessy case, and the Becker case.
It is undisputed that the defendants in the Baloc case, during the period involved herein, were engaged as joint contractors in the construction of the Twin…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Moore v. New York Cotton ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kelly v. Ford, Bacon & Davis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Crabb v. Welden Bros.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Reed v. MurpheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
- Finnan v. Elmhurst Contracting Co.New York Supreme Court · 1950
- Reed v. MurpheyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948