Legal Opinion

Roche-Organon, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 26, 1947No. C. D. 1048Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

"Drugs” and "medicinal preparations,” in a tariff sense, are closely allied terms. Drugs are divided into two categories, i. e., those in a crude state, paragraph 1669 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1201, par. 1669), entitled to free entry, and those advanced in value or condition, paragraph 34 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 34), dutiable at 10 per centum ad valorem. The word “drug” is defined in the statute, paragraph 34, supra, as "those substances having therapeutic or medicinal properties and chiefly used for medicinal purposes.” The statutory…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fink v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. United States v. Hillier's Son Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. McKesson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  4. Synthetic Patents Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  5. Synthetic Patents Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API