Legal Opinion

United States v. Saplala

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 20, 1970No. 22,709PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

After pleading guilty to assault with a dangerous weapon, the appellant testified in mitigation that he acted in self-defense. This inconsistency causes his plea of guilty to the assault with a dangerous weapon charge to be improvident. Consequently, we must set aside the plea to that charge. United States v Messenger, 2 USCMA 21, 6 CMR 21 (1952) ; United States v Walter, 16 USCMA 30, 36 CMR 186 (1966); United States v Baker, 17 USCMA 346, 38 CMR 144 (1967); United States v Vaughn, 17 USCMA 520, 38 CMR 318 (1968).

The decision of the Court of Military Review…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. MessengerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  2. United States v. VaughnUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  3. United States v. WalterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966
  4. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. WoodrumUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  2. United States v. BernierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. WoodsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API