United States v. Bernier
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
2Per curiam
The question before us is whether the accused’s plea of guilty to the charge of involuntary manslaughter was provident. Under the circumstances of this case, we hold that it was not. United States v Woodrum, 20 USCMA 529, 43 CMR 369 (1971); United States v Saplala, 19 USCMA 344, 41 CMR 344 (1970), and cases cited at page 345.
During the inquiry into the providence of the plea (United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247 (1969)), the accused informed the military judge that he had fired his weapon in the belief that he was firing at an enemy soldier. At the time of the…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. WoodrumUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
- United States v. VaughnUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
- United States v. SaplalaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
4Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. WoodsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973