Legal Opinion
Truss v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 16, 2004No. 03-6453PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Jimmie Truss, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court’s order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. His appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon review, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
In 1995, a jury convicted Truss of conspiracy to possess cocaine with intent to distribute and related crimes, and he was sentenced to 232 months’ imprisonment. Truss appealed; we affirmed his convictions and sentence.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- In Re Ocsulis DorsainvilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- In Re James Davenport and Sherman NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- James Charles, (98-5747), Movant (98-0539) v. Ernest v. Chandler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Ben Gary Triestman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Anderson v. OrmondDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2018
- Alford v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- Banks v. PhillipsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- Bartoli v. PhillipsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Borden v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.