M. G. v. Metropolitan Interpreters & Translators, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
JEFFREY T. MILLER, District Judge.
Defendants Metropolitan Interpreters and Translators, Inc. (“Metropolitan”) and J. C., R. P., M. L„ B. A. and C. G. (the “Individual Defendants”) move for partial summary judgment on the claims arising under the Employee Polygraph Protection Act (“EPPA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2002(1), (2), and (3), and the punitive damages claim. Plaintiffs M. G., F. M., L. A., J. M., L. G., F. B„ M. N„ R. G„ L. S., E. R„ M. D., M. T., E. S., and L. P. oppose the motion and separately move for summary judgment on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- International Shortstop, Inc., and Sam Talkington v. Rally's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- Franklin v. Gwinnett County Public SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.