Legal Opinion

Tetrault v. Ingraham

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1918No. 3,899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeals from District Court, Flathead County; T. A. Thompson, Judge. Action by A. D. Tetrault against A. J. Ingraham, Sheriff, and the Kalispell Mercantile Company. Plaintiff had judgment, and defendants appeal from it and an order denying them a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway

delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.

In 1912 the Kalispell Mercantile Company recovered judgment against Clyde Drollinger, caused an execution to be issued thereon and placed in the hands of the sheriff for service. The sheriff levied upon two horses found in the possession of Drollinger, and, after due notice, sold them at public auction to A. D. Tetrault for $340, which amount was. paid over and the judgment satisfied. Immediately prior to the sale Drollinger made claim that the property was exempt and notified the sheriff, who in turn notified the judgment creditor. An indemnifying bond was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Arant v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Dresser v. KronbergSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1911
  3. Cushing v. QuigleyMontana Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Field v. Ingreham, New York County Courts1896
  5. Wyman v. GaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dorwart v. CarawayMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Keller v. FlanaganMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Brenton v. Estate of SandvigMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Kovacich v. NorgaardMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Dorwart v. CarawayMontana Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API