Dresser v. Kronberg
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
On exceptions by defendant. Action for money had and received brought in the Superior Court, Cumberland County. Plea, the general issue. At the conclusion of the evidence the presiding Justice (the late Judge Turner) ordered a verdict for the plaintiff and the defendant excepted. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCornish, J.
The defendant Kronberg recovered judgment against one Waterhouse, took out execution and caused two horses which had been previously attached on mesne process to be sold upon execution at sheriff’s sale as the property of Waterhouse, to the *424plaintiff for the sum of fifty-eight dollars, and the proceeds of the sale were paid by the officer to the defendant in this action as the judgment creditor in the execution.
Subsequently the horses were replevined by the Saco Grain and Milling Company as the true owner thereof and judgment in the replevin suit was duly rendered in favor of said company.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coan v. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Ritter v. HenshawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
- Westerfield v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Julian v. BealIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- Geoghegan v. DittoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mitchell v. MitchellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
- Martel v. BearceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Copper Belle Mining Co. v. GleesonArizona Supreme Court · 1913
- Seastrand v. D. A. Foley & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Barth v. A. & B. Schuster Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.