State Ex Rel. Seymour v. Superior Court
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
The state, on the relation of W. L. Seymour, brought this action to restrain the secretary of state from filing and canvassing petitions in connection with what is known as initiative measure No. 62, generally referred to as the “game control bill.” To the complaint, a demurrer was interposed and sus tained. The plaintiff refused to plead further, and elected to stand upon the complaint. A judgment was entered dismissing the action, and the case is brought here to review this judgment.
The facts alleged in the complaint, sufficient to present the question to be determined, may be summarized as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Malloy v. Marshall-Wells Hardware Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Turnidge v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 1918
- Percival v. Cowychee & Wide Hollow Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- Anderson v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Godfrey v. WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Kreidler v. EikenberryWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- McKenzie v. Mukilteo Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Washington Fed. of State Emp. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State ex rel. Jones v. Charboneau'sCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.