Legal Opinion

Percival v. Cowychee & Wide Hollow Irrigation District

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1896No. 2332PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Yakima County.— Hon. H. B. Rigg, Judge pro tem.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hoyt, C. J.

The only authority for the levy of the tax, the collection of which was in controversy in this action, was the provision of the act of March 22, 1895, (Laws 1895, p. 451, §27), which provided that:

“Whenever the board of directors of any district heretofore formed under this act shall have attempted to incur any indebtedness prior to this amendment going into effect, and when the only ground of the invalidity of such indebtedness is that the board of directors was not authorized to incur such indebtedness so contracted by said board, such…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marston v. HumesWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  2. In re RaffertyWashington Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. In Re Peterson's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Armour & Co. v. Western Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  5. National Ass'n of Creditors, Inc. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1928

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API