Legal Opinion · Dissent

Erickson v. Richardson

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1936No. 7885Published

1Dissent

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

I dissent.

The Bankruptcy Act, § 63 (11 U.S.C.A. § 103), provides that: “Debts of the bankrupt may be proved and allowed against his estate which are * * * founded upon * * * a contract express or implied.” The statute does not say how much of the foundation of the debt must be contractual. It seems to me that there could be only three possible theories with respect to that question.

First. One possible theory is that when the statute says a debt must be “founded upon a contract,” it means that the debt must be “wholly” or “entirely” founded upon a contract. If that…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Coombes v. GetzSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. McClaine v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Keyser v. HitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Scott v. DeweeseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API