Legal Opinion

Rainer v. Unger

United States Customs Court

Decided June 25, 1964No. 7102PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

'WoRley, CMef Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Patent Interferences holding that Eainer et al. cannot make the two counts of the interference.

The invention resides in the incorporation of silicone in a gasket-forming composition of vinyl cMoride resin before curing. The counts read :

1. A gasket forming composition comprising a vinyl cMoride base resin and quantities of lecitMn and silicone fluid, the latter ingredients being present in sufficient amounts so as to be present on the surface of a gasket formed from said composition and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ivar Jepson v. Robert E. Coleman, Jr., and Calvin D. MacCrackenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  2. Lester C. Crome v. Henton MorroghCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
  3. Hurley v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Holmes v. KellyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  2. Hester v. AllgeierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  3. Rainer v. UngerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API