Legal Opinion
Saturday v. Saturday
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided March 3, 1966No. 41792PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Eberhardt, Judge.
The motion to dismiss the appeal was properly denied. That the court of ordinary had jurisdiction of the subject matter is beyond peradventure. The statute, Code Ann. § 113-1232 et seq. (Ga. L. 1958, p. 355 et seq.), specifically provides for the filing of the proceeding in that court.
The general demurrer to the motion to set aside was properly sustained.
The contention that the order of no administration necessary was void on its face because of the failure of the petition to allege that “the heirs at law have agreed upon a division of the estate amicably among themselves,”…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lydia Pinkham Medicine Co. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Union Compress Co. v. Leffler & SonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Bennett v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Wallis v. WatsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. SatterfieldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Saturday v. SaturdaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1968