Department of Human Services v. R. S.

In this juvenile dependency case, mother appeals a permanency judgment changing her child’s permanency plan from reunification to “another planned permanent living arrangement” (APPLA)—here, permanent foster care.1 OAR 413-070-0532(1) (defining types of APPLA). Mother contends that the juvenile court’s findings were inconsistent, and that, even if the findings are viewed as consistent, the juvenile court erred in concluding that it was not safe for her child to return to her care. We affirm.

Mother does not request that we exercise our discretion to conduct de novo review, and we find no…