Legal Opinion

Department of Human Services v. C. M. E.

Clatsop County Circuit Court, Oregon

Decided May 11, 2016No. 14JU01079; A160309PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

Mother appeals a judgment of the juvenile court changing the permanency plan for her child, M, from reunification to adoption.1 The juvenile court concluded that the Department of Human Services (DHS) had made reasonable efforts to reunify M with mother but that mother had not made sufficient progress to make it possible for M to safely return home. ORS 419B.476(2)(a). On appeal, mother challenges the juvenile court’s change of plan, arguing that (1) mother had made sufficient progress to allow M to safely return home, ORS 419B.476(2)(a), and, consequently, that a compelling reason existed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. N. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Department of Human Services v. N. S.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. Department of Human Services v. N. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. H. S. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. S. J. M.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Department of Human Services v. C. L. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Dept. of Human Services v. C. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. Dep't of Human Servs. v. M. T. P. (In re C. J. P.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  5. Dept. of Human Services v. J. D.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API