Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 2006No. JV9473; A128226PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Father appeals from a judgment entered by the juvenile court after a permanency hearing involving his six-year-old child. In the judgment, the trial court found that the Department of Human Services (DHS) had made reasonable efforts to safely return child home and ordered DHS to proceed with the plan of achieving adoption, and father now assigns error to that finding. On de novo review, ORS 419A.200(6)(b), we conclude that DHS did not make reasonable efforts and therefore reverse.

We begin by summarizing the events leading up to the permanency hearing. Our focus is solely on the events…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Oregonians for Sound Economic Policy, Inc. v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. STATE EX REL. JUV. DEPT. OF MULTNOMAH v. DeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. RislandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Department of Human Services v. M. K.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Department of Human Services v. S. M. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Department of Human Services v. D. L. H.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Department of Human Services v. G. N.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. Dep't of Human Servs. v. L.L.S. (In re Z.S.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API