Legal Opinion

Clecak v. Dunn

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1928No. Docket No. 6569PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff and appellant, who is the divorced wife of respondent John A. Clecak, on June 14, 1926, procured a writ of execution for unpaid alimony in the sum of $2,078 to he levied on the respondents W. F. Dunn and J. A. Williams, copartners doing business as Dunn-Williams Co., to garnish a debt alleged to be owing from said Dunn and Williams to respondent Clecak. Dunn and Williams, by return to the levy, denied any indebtedness to Clecak. Thereafter, on June 26, 1926, appellant commenced this suit in equity seeking a decree establishing the existence of said alleged…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Maier v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Early v. Town of Redwood CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Siemon v. Mortgage Investment Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Turner v. EversAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1973
  3. Thomas v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Turner v. EversCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Dawson v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API