Legal Opinion

Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. Floyd

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 1933No. 4-3130PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). It is first sought to uphold the order of the chancellor directing* a resale of the property because of act 21 of 1933. This act in effect authorizes the respective chancery courts of the State to refuse to confirm commissioner’s sales, irrespective of fraud or inequitable conduct in effecting the sale.

Section 4 of act 21 of 1933, cited and relied upon by appellee, reads as follows: “Section 4. Before confirming a sale, the court shall ascertain whether or not, on account of economic conditions, or the circumstances attending the sale, a fair price…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Smith v. SpillmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Southern Grocery Co. v. Merchants' & Planters' Title & Investment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Langever v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Northwestern Loan & Trust Co. v. BidingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Pope v. Shannon BrothersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  4. Martin v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Federal Land Bank of St. Louis v. VineyardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API