Muesig v. Harz
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan
delivered the opinion of the court.
Plaintiff sued George Harz and Ernest A. Warfield; Tessville, an incorporated village, and the Sanitary District of Chicago, a corporation (hereinafter called Sanitary District), in case. The death of defendant Warfield was suggested and the cause proceeded to trial against the other three defendants. A jury returned a verdict finding* the three defendants guilty and assessing plaintiff’s damages in the sum of $3,000. The motion of defendant Harz for judgment in his favor notwithstanding* the verdict was allowed. The motions of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. ClausenIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
- West Chicago Park Commissioners v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Carlin v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
- Plew v. BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
- Mueller v. HayesIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Linneen v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1941
- Southern Railway Company v. LileyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947