Ives v. Beecher
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to foreclose a judgment lien, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County; facts found and case reserved, Rorabaek, J., for the consideration and advice of this court. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPrentice, J.
The plaintiffs seek the foreclosure of a judgment lien. The judgment was one against both the defendants herein. The lien was filed upon six separate pieces of property. It is conceded that the defendant Mrs. Beecher owns the three pieces last described in the hen. The defendants deny that she has such an interest in either of the other three pieces as can be taken under a judgment lien. Confessedly she is not the absolute owner of either. Mr. Beecher has no interest in any of the property, save such as he may have as the husband of Mrs. Beecher.
This situation raises preliminary questions as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beardsley v. BeecherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
- Davenport v. LaconSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845
- Hitchcock v. HotchkissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1816
- Camp v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1823
3Cited by13 opinions
- Coyne v. PlumeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Gregg v. First. Nat. Bank In BrownsvilleTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Humphrey v. GerardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Struzinski v. StruzinskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Loomer v. LoomerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.